4 min read • Guide 594 of 877
How to Use GitScrum for FinTech Development Projects?
How to use GitScrum for FinTech development projects?
Manage FinTech development in GitScrum with compliance labels, mandatory security reviews, and audit-ready documentation in NoteVault. Track regulatory requirements as acceptance criteria, coordinate with compliance teams. FinTech teams with structured compliance workflow pass audits 50% faster [Source: FinTech Compliance Research 2024].
FinTech workflow:
- Requirements - Include compliance
- Threat model - Security analysis
- Develop - Secure coding
- Security review - Mandatory
- Compliance check - Regulatory
- Audit - Documentation
- Deploy - Controlled release
FinTech labels
| Label | Purpose |
|---|---|
| compliance-pci | PCI-DSS related |
| compliance-soc2 | SOC2 related |
| compliance-gdpr | GDPR related |
| security-review | Needs security review |
| audit-critical | Audit documentation required |
| area-payments | Payment processing |
| area-kyc | KYC/AML |
Compliance columns
| Column | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Backlog | All work |
| In Progress | Development |
| Security Review | Mandatory |
| Compliance Review | Regulatory |
| Ready for Deploy | All approved |
| Production | Released |
NoteVault compliance documentation
| Document | Content |
|---|---|
| Compliance matrix | Requirements mapping |
| Security policies | Security standards |
| Audit log | Change documentation |
| Risk assessments | Threat models |
| Incident log | Security incidents |
Compliance task template
## Feature: [name]
### Compliance Requirements
- [ ] PCI-DSS: [applicable controls]
- [ ] SOC2: [applicable controls]
- [ ] GDPR: [applicable controls]
### Security Requirements
- [ ] Threat model complete
- [ ] Secure coding review
- [ ] Penetration testing
- [ ] Vulnerability scan
### Audit Trail
- Design decision: [date, rationale]
- Security review: [date, reviewer]
- Compliance approval: [date, approver]
Security review checklist
| Check | Verify |
|---|---|
| Authentication | Strong auth |
| Authorization | Access controls |
| Encryption | Data protection |
| Logging | Audit trail |
| Input validation | Sanitization |
| Error handling | No info leak |
Compliance workflow
| Step | Action |
|---|---|
| Requirements | Include compliance |
| Design | Threat modeling |
| Implementation | Secure coding |
| Review | Security + compliance |
| Documentation | Audit ready |
| Deploy | Controlled |
Regulatory coordination
| Team | Involvement |
|---|---|
| Development | Implementation |
| Security | Review, testing |
| Compliance | Regulatory review |
| Legal | Interpretation |
| Audit | Validation |
Change management
| Change | Documentation |
|---|---|
| All changes | Task linked to requirement |
| Config changes | Documented in NoteVault |
| Emergency | Post-mortem required |
| Rollback | Documented procedure |
Audit preparation
| Preparation | Implementation |
|---|---|
| Documentation | NoteVault organized |
| Evidence | Task history |
| Controls | Mapped to requirements |
| Testing | Proof of testing |
Common FinTech issues
| Issue | Solution |
|---|---|
| Compliance gaps | Checklist in tasks |
| Missing docs | NoteVault requirement |
| Security bypass | Mandatory review |
| Audit failure | Organized documentation |
FinTech metrics
| Metric | Track |
|---|---|
| Security review time | Column cycle time |
| Compliance issues | Found post-deploy |
| Audit findings | Per audit |
| Security incidents | By severity |