6 min read • Guide 165 of 877
Effective Technical Debt Management
Technical debt is inevitable—the question is whether you manage it or let it manage you. Untracked debt compounds silently until development grinds to a halt. Effective management means making debt visible, prioritizing strategically, and allocating consistent effort to reduce it.
Technical Debt Types
| Type | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Intentional | Known shortcut for speed | Hardcoded config for MVP |
| Unintentional | Emerged over time | Spaghetti code evolution |
| Outdated | Was good, now isn't | Old framework version |
| Bit rot | Degraded from neglect | Unmaintained dependencies |
| Documentation | Missing/wrong docs | Outdated API docs |
Making Debt Visible
Tracking Technical Debt
TECHNICAL DEBT INVENTORY
════════════════════════
GITSCRUM DEBT TRACKING:
├── Create "Technical Debt" label
├── Tag all debt items consistently
├── Use board filter for debt view
├── Track in dedicated column or backlog
DEBT ITEM TEMPLATE:
─────────────────────────────────────
Title: [Clear description of debt]
Type: [Intentional/Unintentional/Outdated]
Location: [Files/services affected]
Impact: [How it affects development]
Risk: [What could go wrong]
Effort: [S/M/L estimate]
Trigger: [When should we fix this]
─────────────────────────────────────
EXAMPLE:
─────────────────────────────────────
Title: Auth module has no tests
Type: Unintentional (grew without TDD)
Location: /src/auth/*
Impact: High - Changes are risky, slow reviews
Risk: Auth bugs reach production
Effort: L (estimated 2 weeks)
Trigger: Before any auth changes
─────────────────────────────────────
Debt Dashboard
TECHNICAL DEBT DASHBOARD
════════════════════════
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Technical Debt Overview │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ CURRENT STATE │
│ Total items: 47 │
│ Critical: 3 | High: 12 | Medium: 20 | Low: 12 │
│ │
│ BY CATEGORY │
│ ████████░░ Code: 23 (49%) │
│ ████░░░░░░ Testing: 9 (19%) │
│ ███░░░░░░░ Docs: 7 (15%) │
│ ██░░░░░░░░ Infra: 5 (11%) │
│ █░░░░░░░░░ Dependencies: 3 (6%) │
│ │
│ TREND │
│ Added this month: 8 │
│ Resolved this month: 11 │
│ Net change: -3 ↘ (improving) │
│ │
│ EFFORT INVESTED │
│ This sprint: 15% of capacity │
│ Target: 20% │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Prioritization
Debt Prioritization Matrix
PRIORITIZATION FRAMEWORK
════════════════════════
SCORE EACH ITEM (1-5):
IMPACT: How much does it slow us?
├── 5: Blocks multiple features weekly
├── 4: Blocks work monthly
├── 3: Slows work regularly
├── 2: Occasional friction
└── 1: Minor inconvenience
RISK: What could go wrong?
├── 5: Security/data loss risk
├── 4: Production outage risk
├── 3: Significant bugs likely
├── 2: Minor bugs possible
└── 1: Cosmetic issues only
OPPORTUNITY: What does fixing enable?
├── 5: Enables major initiative
├── 4: Unblocks near-term feature
├── 3: Enables nice-to-have
├── 2: General improvement
└── 1: Minimal benefit
EFFORT: How hard to fix?
├── 1: Week+ of work
├── 2: Days of work
├── 3: 1-2 days
├── 4: Hours
└── 5: Quick fix
PRIORITY SCORE = Impact + Risk + Opportunity + Effort
Example:
Auth tests missing:
Impact: 4 + Risk: 4 + Opportunity: 3 + Effort: 2 = 13 (HIGH)
Prioritization Categories
DEBT PRIORITIZATION BUCKETS
═══════════════════════════
🔴 CRITICAL (Score 16-20):
├── Address immediately
├── Security or stability risk
├── Blocks critical path
└── Allocate dedicated sprint
🟠 HIGH (Score 12-15):
├── Schedule for next sprint
├── Include with related feature
├── Don't let accumulate
└── Regular attention
🟡 MEDIUM (Score 8-11):
├── Include in sprint planning
├── Opportunistic fixes
├── Address when touching area
└── Track but don't rush
🟢 LOW (Score 4-7):
├── Track for future
├── Fix if convenient
├── May never address
└── Re-evaluate periodically
Paying Down Debt
Allocation Strategies
DEBT ALLOCATION APPROACHES
══════════════════════════
APPROACH 1: Fixed Percentage
─────────────────────────────────────
Allocate 15-20% of each sprint to debt
├── Predictable capacity
├── Consistent progress
├── Team knows expectation
└── Won't eliminate large items quickly
Example: 80-point sprint → 16 points for debt
APPROACH 2: Debt Sprints
─────────────────────────────────────
Periodic all-debt sprint (quarterly)
├── Big chunks addressed
├── Team focus on quality
├── Can feel like break
└── Debt accumulates between
Example: Every 4th sprint is debt sprint
APPROACH 3: Boy Scout Rule
─────────────────────────────────────
Leave code better than you found it
├── Continuous improvement
├── No dedicated allocation
├── Integrated with features
└── May miss big items
Rule: 30 min improvement with each PR
APPROACH 4: Hybrid (Recommended)
─────────────────────────────────────
├── 15% sprint capacity (consistent)
├── Boy scout rule (continuous)
├── Annual debt sprint (major items)
└── Critical items get special allocation
Implementation Patterns
DEBT REDUCTION PATTERNS
═══════════════════════
STRANGLER FIG:
├── Build new system alongside old
├── Gradually migrate functionality
├── Eventually retire old system
├── Low risk, slower
REFACTOR IN PLACE:
├── Improve existing code
├── Maintain functionality
├── May need feature freeze
├── Faster but riskier
OPPORTUNISTIC:
├── Improve when touching code
├── Scope limited to task area
├── No dedicated time needed
├── Slow overall progress
BIG BANG:
├── Rewrite completely
├── Significant effort
├── High risk
├── Sometimes necessary
RULE OF THUMB:
├── Small debt: Opportunistic
├── Medium debt: Sprint allocation
├── Large debt: Strangler or dedicated sprint
└── Critical debt: Immediate attention
GitScrum for Debt Management
Tracking Setup
GITSCRUM DEBT MANAGEMENT SETUP
══════════════════════════════
LABELS:
├── tech-debt (main label)
├── debt:critical
├── debt:high
├── debt:medium
├── debt:low
CUSTOM FIELDS:
├── Debt Type: [dropdown]
├── Affected Area: [text]
├── Risk Level: [dropdown]
├── Created Date: [date]
VIEWS:
├── Tech Debt Dashboard (filtered view)
├── By Priority (sorted)
├── By Age (oldest first)
├── By Area (grouped)
AUTOMATION:
├── Age alert after 90 days
├── Remind when touching affected files
├── Include in sprint planning
└── Track resolution rate
Best Practices
For Technical Debt
- Make it visible — Track every debt item
- Prioritize systematically — Not just gut feel
- Allocate consistently — 15-20% capacity
- Measure progress — Are we gaining or losing?
- Celebrate repayment — Recognize quality work
Anti-Patterns
DEBT MANAGEMENT MISTAKES:
✗ Ignoring until crisis
✗ No tracking system
✗ All-or-nothing approach
✗ Feature-only sprints
✗ Big bang rewrites (usually)
✗ Prioritizing new over fix
✗ No visibility to stakeholders
✗ Debt as punishment