Try free
6 min read Guide 544 of 877

Managing Technical Dependencies Effectively

Dependencies between tasks, teams, and systems create coordination challenges that can derail projects when not managed proactively. GitScrum's dependency tracking and cross-project visibility help teams identify blockers before they become critical and coordinate handoffs between teams. The key is making dependencies visible and planning around them.

Dependency Types

TypeExampleRisk Level
SequentialAPI before UIMedium
Library/Packagenpm package updateVariable
InfrastructureDatabase, cloud servicesHigh
Cross-teamOther team's deliverableHigh
ExternalVendor, third-party APIVery High
KnowledgeExpertise or documentationMedium

Dependency Management Framework

DEPENDENCY TRACKING WORKFLOW

1. IDENTIFY (During Planning)
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  For each task, ask:                            │
│                                                 │
│  "What must exist before I can start?"          │
│  ├── Code/APIs from other work                  │
│  ├── Infrastructure or environments             │
│  ├── Decisions or approvals                     │
│  └── Knowledge or documentation                 │
│                                                 │
│  "What is waiting on my work?"                  │
│  ├── Downstream tasks                           │
│  ├── Other teams' work                          │
│  └── Customer deliverables                      │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
              │
              ▼
2. DOCUMENT (In Task)
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  Task: Implement payment processing             │
│                                                 │
│  Dependencies (Blocked by):                     │
│  ├── [TASK-234] Payment gateway API contract    │
│  │   Status: In Progress                        │
│  │   Expected: End of Sprint 4                  │
│  │                                              │
│  └── [INFRA-56] Payment sandbox environment     │
│      Status: Requested                          │
│      Expected: 3 days                           │
│                                                 │
│  Dependents (Blocking):                         │
│  ├── [TASK-345] Checkout flow integration       │
│  └── [TASK-346] Order confirmation emails       │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
              │
              ▼
3. MONITOR (Throughout Sprint)
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  Daily check:                                   │
│  ├── Are my blockers resolved?                  │
│  ├── Am I on track for my dependents?           │
│  └── Any new risks to flag?                     │
│                                                 │
│  Update dependency status when changed          │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
              │
              ▼
4. ESCALATE (When Blocked)
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  Day 1: Blocked → Notify dependency owner       │
│  Day 2: Still blocked → Daily standup mention   │
│  Day 3: Still blocked → Escalate to lead        │
│  Day 5: Still blocked → Management escalation   │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Dependency Visualization

DEPENDENCY MAP EXAMPLE

Sprint 6 Dependencies:

┌─────────────┐
│ TASK-234    │
│ API Contract│
└──────┬──────┘
       │ blocks
       ▼
┌─────────────┐      ┌─────────────┐
│ TASK-235    │      │ INFRA-56    │
│ API Impl    │      │ Sandbox Env │
└──────┬──────┘      └──────┬──────┘
       │ blocks            │ blocks
       │    ┌──────────────┘
       ▼    ▼
┌─────────────┐
│ TASK-236    │
│ Payment     │
│ Processing  │
└──────┬──────┘
       │ blocks
       ├────────────────┐
       ▼                ▼
┌─────────────┐  ┌─────────────┐
│ TASK-345    │  │ TASK-346    │
│ Checkout    │  │ Order Email │
└─────────────┘  └─────────────┘

CRITICAL PATH: TASK-234 → TASK-235 → TASK-236 → TASK-345
Any delay in critical path delays the feature.

Dependency Board View

DEPENDENCY TRACKING BOARD

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  DEPENDENCY STATUS OVERVIEW                                         │
├─────────────┬──────────────────┬────────────────┬───────────────────┤
│ On Track    │ At Risk          │ Blocked        │ Resolved          │
├─────────────┼──────────────────┼────────────────┼───────────────────┤
│ [DEP-1]     │ [DEP-4]          │ [DEP-7]        │ [DEP-10] ✓        │
│ API Design  │ Vendor Response  │ DB Migration   │ Auth Service      │
│ Due: Fri    │ Due: Yesterday!  │ Blocked 2 days │ Completed Tue     │
│             │                  │                │                   │
│ [DEP-2]     │ [DEP-5]          │                │ [DEP-11] ✓        │
│ SDK Update  │ Design Review    │                │ Config Setup      │
│ Due: Mon    │ Waiting input    │                │ Completed Mon     │
│             │                  │                │                   │
│ [DEP-3]     │ [DEP-6]          │                │                   │
│ Test Data   │ Infra Provision  │                │                   │
│ Due: Next   │ 1 day behind     │                │                   │
└─────────────┴──────────────────┴────────────────┴───────────────────┘

LABELS:
├── [dep:internal] - Within team
├── [dep:cross-team] - Other team
├── [dep:external] - Vendor/third-party
├── [dep:infra] - Infrastructure
└── [dep:decision] - Awaiting decision

Mitigation Strategies

DEPENDENCY RISK MITIGATION

STRATEGY 1: MOCK AND PARALLELIZE
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  When: Waiting for API from another team        │
│                                                 │
│  Approach:                                      │
│  1. Get API contract/spec first                 │
│  2. Create mock implementation                  │
│  3. Develop against mock in parallel            │
│  4. Swap mock for real when available           │
│                                                 │
│  Risk: Mock may not match real behavior         │
│  Mitigation: Integration testing when ready     │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

STRATEGY 2: BUFFER TIME
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  When: External dependency with uncertain date  │
│                                                 │
│  Approach:                                      │
│  1. Estimate realistic date                     │
│  2. Add 30-50% buffer                           │
│  3. Plan other work for buffer period           │
│  4. Pull forward if dependency arrives early    │
│                                                 │
│  Example:                                       │
│  Vendor says "2 weeks" → Plan for 3 weeks       │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

STRATEGY 3: ALTERNATIVE PATH
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  When: High-risk dependency                     │
│                                                 │
│  Approach:                                      │
│  1. Identify fallback option                    │
│  2. Keep fallback ready to implement            │
│  3. Set decision deadline                       │
│  4. Switch to fallback if needed                │
│                                                 │
│  Example:                                       │
│  If vendor API delayed → Use alternative vendor │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Dependency Metrics

DEPENDENCY HEALTH DASHBOARD

CURRENT STATE:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  Active dependencies: 18                        │
│  ├── On track: 12 (67%)           ✓             │
│  ├── At risk: 4 (22%)             ⚠             │
│  └── Blocked: 2 (11%)             🔴            │
│                                                 │
│  Average resolution time: 3.2 days              │
│  Longest current block: 5 days                  │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

TRENDS:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  Sprint    Dependencies   Blocked   Avg Time    │
│  ─────────────────────────────────────────────  │
│  Sprint 4       12           1       2.1 days   │
│  Sprint 5       15           2       2.8 days   │
│  Sprint 6       18           2       3.2 days   │
│                                                 │
│  Trend: Increasing dependencies (growing scope) │
│  Action: Review architecture for coupling       │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Best Practices

  1. Identify dependencies early during planning
  2. Document explicitly in tasks with links
  3. Daily visibility in standups
  4. Escalate quickly when blocked
  5. Mock interfaces for parallel development
  6. Buffer for externals with uncertain dates
  7. Track metrics to improve over time
  8. Review patterns for architectural improvements

Anti-Patterns

✗ Implicit dependencies ("they know we need it")
✗ Discovering dependencies mid-sprint
✗ No escalation path for blockers
✗ Waiting silently when blocked
✗ No tracking of external dependencies
✗ Planning work before dependencies confirmed