6 min read • Guide 357 of 877
Microservices Project Management
Microservices add coordination complexity to project management. Each service may have its own team, timeline, and priorities. Good microservices management maintains visibility across services while respecting autonomy. Poor management leads to integration nightmares.
Microservices Challenges
| Challenge | Solution |
|---|---|
| Coordination | Cross-team visibility |
| Dependencies | API contracts |
| Integration | Continuous testing |
| Communication | Regular syncs |
Project Structure
Organizing Work
MICROSERVICES PROJECT STRUCTURE
═══════════════════════════════
SERVICE-BASED PROJECTS:
─────────────────────────────────────
Each service = project:
├── user-service
├── order-service
├── payment-service
├── notification-service
├── inventory-service
└── Independent backlogs
CROSS-CUTTING EPICS:
─────────────────────────────────────
Feature spanning services:
Epic: "Implement subscription billing"
├── user-service: Subscription model
├── payment-service: Recurring charges
├── notification-service: Billing emails
├── order-service: Subscription orders
├── Tracked together
└── Coordinated delivery
LABELS FOR COORDINATION:
─────────────────────────────────────
├── integration-point
├── breaking-change
├── needs-coordination
├── blocked-by-[service]
├── api-change
└── Cross-team visibility
Dependency Management
Handling Dependencies
DEPENDENCY MANAGEMENT
═════════════════════
API CONTRACTS:
─────────────────────────────────────
Define explicitly:
├── OpenAPI specs for each service
├── Version contracts
├── Breaking change process
├── Contract testing
├── Single source of truth
└── Explicit agreements
DEPENDENCY MAPPING:
─────────────────────────────────────
Service dependencies:
┌────────────────────────────────────┐
│ order-service │
│ │ │
│ ├──→ user-service │
│ ├──→ inventory-service │
│ ├──→ payment-service │
│ └──→ notification-service │
└────────────────────────────────────┘
Document:
├── Who depends on whom
├── API versions in use
├── Breaking change impact
├── Update when changes
└── Dependency visibility
BLOCKING DEPENDENCIES:
─────────────────────────────────────
When blocked:
├── Create dependency link in task
├── Label: blocked-by-[service]
├── Communicate to other team
├── Track in cross-team sync
├── Visible blockers
└── Fast resolution
EXAMPLE:
─────────────────────────────────────
Task: "Implement subscription renewal"
Depends on: payment-service#234 "Add recurring charge API"
Status: Blocked
Expected: Next sprint
└── Clear visibility
└── Cross-team tracking
Cross-Team Coordination
Communication
CROSS-TEAM COORDINATION
═══════════════════════
SYNC MEETINGS:
─────────────────────────────────────
Regular coordination:
├── Weekly cross-team sync
├── Reps from each service team
├── 30 minutes max
├── Focus on dependencies
├── Blockers and timelines
└── Coordination forum
SHARED ROADMAP:
─────────────────────────────────────
All teams see:
├── Major features coming
├── Breaking changes planned
├── Cross-cutting initiatives
├── Timeline visibility
├── Quarterly view
└── Big picture alignment
COMMUNICATION CHANNELS:
─────────────────────────────────────
├── #platform-coordination (Slack)
├── API change announcements
├── Breaking change notices
├── Service status updates
├── Fast communication
└── Right channels
INTEGRATION TESTING:
─────────────────────────────────────
Regular integration:
├── Automated contract tests
├── Integration environment
├── Cross-service test suites
├── Catch issues early
├── Continuous integration
└── Confidence in integration
Release Coordination
Deploying Together
RELEASE COORDINATION
════════════════════
INDEPENDENT DEPLOYABILITY:
─────────────────────────────────────
Goal: Services deploy independently
├── Backward-compatible APIs
├── No coordinated releases
├── Each team deploys when ready
├── No waiting for others
└── Maximum autonomy
WHEN COORDINATION NEEDED:
─────────────────────────────────────
Breaking changes:
├── New API version
├── Schema migrations
├── Major feature launches
├── Coordinated timing required
└── Exception, not rule
RELEASE TRAIN:
─────────────────────────────────────
For major features:
├── All services ready by date
├── Coordinated deployment
├── Feature flags until ready
├── Single launch moment
├── Stakeholder communication
└── Big launches
FEATURE FLAGS:
─────────────────────────────────────
Coordination tool:
├── Deploy code independently
├── Flag controls activation
├── Coordinate flag flip
├── Gradual rollout
├── Safe coordination
└── Decoupled deployment
EXAMPLE WORKFLOW:
─────────────────────────────────────
Feature: New checkout flow
├── order-service: Deploy with flag off
├── payment-service: Deploy with flag off
├── user-service: Deploy with flag off
├── All ready: Flip flags together
├── Gradual rollout: 5% → 25% → 100%
└── Safe, coordinated
Service Catalog
Visibility
SERVICE CATALOG
═══════════════
DOCUMENT EACH SERVICE:
─────────────────────────────────────
user-service:
├── Owner: Team Auth
├── Description: User management and auth
├── Repository: github.com/org/user-service
├── API Docs: docs.example.com/user-api
├── Slack: #team-auth
├── On-call: PagerDuty rotation
├── Dependencies: postgres, redis
└── Findable information
CATALOG CONTENTS:
─────────────────────────────────────
For each service:
├── Name and description
├── Owning team
├── Contact information
├── Documentation links
├── API specifications
├── Monitoring dashboards
├── Runbooks
└── Everything findable
KEEPING UPDATED:
─────────────────────────────────────
├── Part of service onboarding
├── Reviewed quarterly
├── Team responsibility
├── Automated where possible
├── Current information
└── Living documentation
GitScrum Setup
Configuration
GITSCRUM FOR MICROSERVICES
══════════════════════════
PROJECT PER SERVICE:
─────────────────────────────────────
├── Create project per service
├── Team assigned
├── Independent backlog
├── Service-level velocity
└── Autonomy
CROSS-PROJECT VISIBILITY:
─────────────────────────────────────
├── Cross-project links
├── Shared labels
├── Epic spanning projects
├── Roadmap view
└── Big picture
INTEGRATION TRACKING:
─────────────────────────────────────
Labels:
├── api-change
├── breaking-change
├── needs-integration-test
├── cross-team
└── Visible coordination
DOCUMENTATION:
─────────────────────────────────────
NoteVault:
├── Service catalog
├── API documentation links
├── Architecture diagrams
├── Decision records
└── Central knowledge
Best Practices
For Microservices Management
- Independent backlogs — Each team owns theirs
- Visible dependencies — Track cross-team
- API contracts — Explicit and tested
- Regular sync — Cross-team coordination
- Feature flags — Decouple deployment
Anti-Patterns
MICROSERVICES MANAGEMENT MISTAKES:
✗ Coupled releases
✗ Hidden dependencies
✗ No API contracts
✗ No cross-team sync
✗ Breaking changes without notice
✗ No service catalog
✗ Single monolithic backlog
✗ Ignoring integration testing