4 min leitura • Guide 531 of 877
How to Use GitScrum for Distributed Development Teams?
How to use GitScrum for distributed development teams?
GitScrum excels for distributed teams with async Team Standup, visual Kanban boards, and NoteVault documentation. Team members across timezones post updates at their local time, view board for context, and reference documentation anytime. Distributed teams using async-first PM are 35% more productive than sync-heavy alternatives [Source: Remote Work Report 2024].
Distributed team setup:
- Create project - Standard setup
- Enable Team Standup - Async updates
- Document heavily - NoteVault everything
- Configure notifications - Column subscribers
- Set expectations - Response SLAs
- Define overlap - Sync meeting times
Async-first workflow
| Activity | Sync Meeting | GitScrum Async |
|---|---|---|
| Daily standup | 15-30 min | Team Standup (5 min each) |
| Status check | Meeting | Board view |
| Documentation | Meeting | NoteVault |
| Code review | Wait for overlap | Column subscriber notification |
| Planning | Keep sync | Sprint planning meeting |
Team Standup for global teams
| Timezone | Post Time | View Updates |
|---|---|---|
| APAC (UTC+8) | 9am local | Evening for Americas |
| Europe (UTC+1) | 9am local | Morning for APAC, evening Americas |
| Americas (UTC-5) | 9am local | Afternoon for Europe |
Documentation for distributed teams
| Document | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Decision log | Why we decided X |
| Technical specs | Implementation details |
| Runbooks | How to operate |
| Onboarding | New team member guide |
| Process | How we work |
Communication SLAs
| Priority | Response Time |
|---|---|
| P1 Critical | 2 hours (phone/page) |
| P2 High | 4 hours |
| P3 Medium | 24 hours |
| P4 Low | 48 hours |
Handoff practices
| Handoff Type | Implementation |
|---|---|
| End of day | Update Team Standup |
| Blocked work | Clear description in task |
| Code review | Comment with context |
| Urgent issues | Escalation channel |
Column subscribers for global teams
| Column | Subscribers |
|---|---|
| Blocked | All timezones |
| Code Review | Reviewers in timezone |
| Ready for Test | QA team |
| Production | On-call rotation |
NoteVault for distributed teams
| Use Case | Benefit |
|---|---|
| Meeting notes | Async participants can read |
| Decisions | Context for all timezones |
| Architecture | Reference anytime |
| Runbooks | 24/7 availability |
Reducing sync dependencies
| Dependency | Async Alternative |
|---|---|
| Quick question | Task comment |
| Status update | Team Standup |
| Code review | Thorough PR description |
| Pair programming | Screen recording + async review |
Overlap meeting strategy
| Meeting | Keep Sync | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Sprint planning | Yes | Complex discussion |
| Retrospective | Yes | Team dynamics |
| 1:1s | Yes | Personal connection |
| Standups | No | Team Standup |
| Status meetings | No | Board visibility |
Distributed team metrics
| Metric | Tracking |
|---|---|
| Response time | Time to first reply |
| Async coverage | % Team Standup participation |
| Documentation | NoteVault freshness |
| Handoff quality | Blocked items |
| Team health | Retrospective feedback |