GitScrum
Testar grátis
5 min leitura • Guide 698 of 877

How to Use GitScrum for Quality Assurance Teams?

How to use GitScrum for quality assurance teams?

Manage QA teams in GitScrum with test planning tasks, bug tracking, and documentation in NoteVault. Coordinate with development, track test coverage, measure quality metrics. QA teams with structured workflow reduce escaped defects by 50% [Source: Quality Assurance Research 2024].

QA workflow:

  1. Plan - Test strategy
  2. Design - Write test cases
  3. Prepare - Setup environment
  4. Execute - Run tests
  5. Report - Document results
  6. Track - Bug management
  7. Verify - Confirm fixes

QA labels

LabelPurpose
type-testingTest work
type-bugBug report
severity-criticalCritical bug
severity-highHigh priority bug
severity-mediumMedium bug
severity-lowLow priority bug
test-automatedAutomation work

QA columns

ColumnPurpose
To TestAwaiting testing
TestingIn progress
Bugs FoundIssues discovered
VerifiedFixes confirmed
DoneComplete

NoteVault QA docs

DocumentContent
Test strategyOverall approach
Test plansPer release/feature
Test casesDetailed steps
Bug trackingKnown issues
Quality metricsDashboard

Test plan template

## Test Plan: [feature/release]

### Scope
- Features: [list]
- Out of scope: [list]

### Test Types
- [ ] Functional
- [ ] Regression
- [ ] Performance
- [ ] Security
- [ ] Accessibility

### Environment
- Environment: [name]
- Data requirements: [description]

### Schedule
| Phase | Start | End |
|-------|-------|-----|
| Test design | [date] | [date] |
| Execution | [date] | [date] |
| Bug fixing | [date] | [date] |

### Entry Criteria
- [ ] Dev complete
- [ ] Environment ready
- [ ] Test cases ready

### Exit Criteria
- [ ] All critical tests pass
- [ ] No critical bugs open
- [ ] Coverage target met

### Team
- Lead: @[person]
- Testers: @[people]

Bug report template

## Bug: [title]

### Severity
[Critical/High/Medium/Low]

### Environment
- Version: [version]
- Browser/OS: [info]
- Environment: [dev/staging/prod]

### Steps to Reproduce
1. [Step 1]
2. [Step 2]
3. [Step 3]

### Expected Result
[What should happen]

### Actual Result
[What actually happens]

### Screenshots/Logs
[Attachments]

### Impact
[Who/what is affected]

Severity definitions

SeverityDefinition
CriticalSystem down, data loss
HighMajor feature broken
MediumFeature degraded
LowMinor issue, workaround exists

Test types

TypePurpose
SmokeBasic functionality
FunctionalFeature works
RegressionNo regressions
ExploratoryFind edge cases
PerformanceSpeed, scale

Test-dev integration

PracticeImplementation
Shift leftEarly QA involvement
Parallel testingTest as dev builds
AutomationCI/CD integration
Code reviewsReview test coverage

Quality metrics

MetricTrack
Defect densityBugs per feature
Escaped defectsBugs in production
Test coverage% covered
Pass rate% tests passing
Time to fixBug resolution time

Bug priority matrix

Severity × FrequencyPriority
Critical, frequentP0 - Immediate
High, frequentP1 - Same day
Medium, occasionalP2 - This sprint
Low, rareP3 - Backlog

Automation strategy

Test TypeAutomate?
Unit testsYes, high ROI
API testsYes, stable
UI smoke testsYes, critical paths
ExploratoryNo, manual

Test environment management

EnvironmentPurpose
DevDeveloper testing
QAQA testing
StagingPre-production
ProductionLive

Common QA challenges

ChallengeSolution
Late testingShift left
Flaky testsStable environments
Scope creepClear test scope
Bug backlogPrioritization

Test completion checklist

CheckVerify
☐ All planned tests runComplete
☐ Critical bugs fixedResolved
☐ Regression passedNo new issues
☐ Documentation updatedCurrent
☐ Sign-off obtainedApproved
Voltar para Guias Práticos