4 min lectura • Guide 224 of 877
Time Tracking Feels Like Surveillance for Developers
Developers resist time tracking that feels like surveillance. GitScrum's approach focuses on project-level insights rather than minute-by-minute monitoring—time is tracked per task for estimation accuracy and billing, not for performance surveillance, respecting developer autonomy while providing necessary business data.
Why Developers Hate Time Tracking
Common Complaints
TIME TRACKING PROBLEMS:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ WHAT MAKES TRACKING FEEL LIKE SURVEILLANCE │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ ❌ SCREENSHOT TOOLS: │
│ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐│
│ │ • Random screenshots capture personal info ││
│ │ • "Active time" metrics penalize thinking ││
│ │ • Keystroke monitoring feels invasive ││
│ │ • Browser history tracking crosses boundaries ││
│ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘│
│ │
│ ❌ MICRO-TRACKING: │
│ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐│
│ │ • Start/stop timers for every small task ││
│ │ • "Account for every minute" policies ││
│ │ • Questioning of 5-minute gaps ││
│ │ • Comparison of hours between team members ││
│ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘│
│ │
│ ❌ PUNITIVE USE: │
│ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐│
│ │ • Low hours = poor performance review ││
│ │ • Used to justify layoffs ││
│ │ • Published rankings embarrass developers ││
│ │ • "Why did this take so long?" interrogations ││
│ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘│
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
GitScrum's Approach
Respectful Time Tracking
| Principle | Implementation |
|---|---|
| Task-level granularity | Track per task, not per minute |
| Developer-controlled | You log your own time |
| Project focus | Data used for estimation, not surveillance |
| Aggregate reporting | Team-level insights, not individual rankings |
| Optional adoption | Enable for billable projects only |
Healthy Time Tracking Uses
Legitimate Business Needs
WHY TIME DATA MATTERS (NON-SURVEILLANCE):
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ VALUABLE USES OF TIME DATA │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ ✅ ESTIMATION IMPROVEMENT: │
│ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐│
│ │ • "We estimated 8 hours, it took 12—let's learn why" ││
│ │ • Historical data improves future estimates ││
│ │ • Identify consistently underestimated task types ││
│ │ • Build more accurate project timelines ││
│ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘│
│ │
│ ✅ CLIENT BILLING: │
│ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐│
│ │ • Accurate invoices for time-and-materials projects ││
│ │ • Justify quotes with historical data ││
│ │ • Track budget consumption per project ││
│ │ • Prevent scope creep with time visibility ││
│ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘│
│ │
│ ✅ CAPACITY PLANNING: │
│ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐│
│ │ • Understand team velocity for planning ││
│ │ • Identify need for additional resources ││
│ │ • Balance workload across projects ││
│ │ • Set realistic sprint commitments ││
│ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘│
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Implementation Guide
Building Trust with Time Tracking
- Explain the purpose - "For estimation and billing, not surveillance"
- Let developers own their data - Self-reported, not monitored
- Share at team level only - No individual hour comparisons
- Focus on patterns, not incidents - "Tasks like X take longer than expected"
- Never use for performance reviews - Keep time data separate from evaluations