4 min lectura • Guide 341 of 877
Kanban vs Scrum: Which Methodology Fits Your Development Team?
Kanban vs Scrum: which methodology fits your development team?
Choose Kanban for continuous delivery, support teams, and flexible priorities. Choose Scrum for predictable releases, dedicated teams, and stakeholder demos. GitScrum supports both: use sprint columns and velocity tracking for Scrum, or continuous flow boards with WIP limits for Kanban. Most modern teams use hybrid approaches combining both [Source: State of Agile Report 2024].
Kanban vs Scrum comparison table
| Aspect | Kanban | Scrum |
|---|---|---|
| Iterations | Continuous flow | 1-4 week sprints |
| Planning | On-demand | Sprint planning session |
| WIP limits | Core requirement | Optional |
| Roles | Flexible, no prescribed roles | Scrum Master, Product Owner, Team |
| Meetings | As needed | Daily standup, planning, review, retro |
| Metrics | Lead time, throughput | Velocity, burndown |
| Changes | Can change priorities anytime | Wait for next sprint |
| Best for | Continuous delivery, support | Predictable releases, demos |
When to choose Kanban:
- Support and maintenance teams - Unpredictable incoming work
- Continuous deployment - Ship when ready, not on schedule
- Changing priorities - Stakeholders frequently reprioritize
- Overhead-averse teams - Minimal ceremonies preferred
- DevOps workflows - Continuous improvement focus
- Mixed work types - Bugs, features, and support together
When to choose Scrum:
- Product development - Building new features with demos
- Stakeholder visibility - Regular sprint reviews
- Predictable delivery - Know what ships when
- New teams - Structure helps establish habits
- Complex projects - Planning ceremonies add clarity
- Cross-functional teams - Defined roles reduce confusion
GitScrum features for each methodology
| Feature | Kanban Use | Scrum Use |
|---|---|---|
| WIP limits | Core workflow control | Optional enhancement |
| Sprint columns | Not used | Sprint Backlog, In Sprint |
| Velocity reports | Throughput tracking | Sprint velocity |
| Team Standup | Async status updates | Daily standup replacement |
| Auto-archive | Continuous cleanup | End of sprint cleanup |
| Labels | Work type categorization | Sprint goals, priorities |
Hybrid approach (Scrumban)
Combine the best of both:
- Use sprints for planning - 2-week iterations for commitment
- Apply WIP limits - Prevent overload within sprint
- Continuous refinement - Groom backlog continuously
- Flexible scope - Allow urgent items mid-sprint with rules
- Retrospectives - Keep improvement ceremonies